The recent crypto market downturn has triggered significant shifts in institutional investment strategies. Grayscale's Bitcoin and Ethereum Trusts have continued to see outflows, with their premium rates hitting unprecedented negative levels. This trend reflects changing institutional sentiment toward major digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
While Grayscale has been reducing its holdings in some areas, it continues to explore new investment opportunities. The company is currently evaluating 25 additional digital assets for potential inclusion in its investment products. Meanwhile, several other crypto asset management firms have recently announced plans to launch ETFs, suggesting that digital asset ETFs may become the next competitive frontier in crypto investing.
Grayscale Trust Premium Rates Reach Historic Lows
Data from Kingdata reveals a significant development: on January 21, 2022, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) reached a negative premium of -29.9%, setting a new historical record. While GBTC has maintained a negative premium since late February 2021, the trend of declining premium rates has become particularly pronounced since November 2021, consistently setting new record lows.
Grayscale's Ethereum Trust (ETHE) shows a similar pattern, reaching a -27.9% premium on January 21, 2022. These negative premiums indicate that some investors in Grayscale's Bitcoin and Ethereum Trusts may face losses in secondary market trading.
Concurrent with these premium changes, Grayscale's holdings have continued to decrease. Over the past month, the Bitcoin Trust reduced its holdings by 1,059 BTC, while the Ethereum Trust decreased its ETH holdings by 6,395. As of January 26, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust held approximately 643,900 BTC, while the Ethereum Trust maintained holdings of about 3.11 million ETH.
These record negative premium rates represent a dramatic shift from historical patterns. Previously, GBTC consistently maintained high positive premium rates (often exceeding 20%), primarily due to Grayscale's high investment thresholds, lock-up mechanisms, and non-redemption features that created strong secondary market demand. The current negative premiums suggest weakened secondary market demand and changing attitudes among institutional investors toward major digital assets—a shift coinciding with the recent crypto market decline.
As of January 28, Grayscale's total assets under management stood at $32.1 billion, representing a decline of over 47% from the $61 billion recorded in early November. The Bitcoin Trust, Grayscale's largest holding, saw its assets drop from $43.5 billion to $23.4 billion during this period—a 46% decrease. Similarly, the Ethereum Trust declined from nearly $15 billion to $7.5 billion, a 50% reduction. Despite these recent declines, Grayscale's total AUM has still grown 103% compared to one year ago, largely due to its expanding range of investment products.
Major Institutions Continue to Accumulate Positions
Despite the historically low negative premium rates affecting Grayscale's primary trust funds, institutional interest in GBTC appears undiminished, and Grayscale continues to pursue new digital asset fund offerings.
Recent SEC filings on Form 13F-HR reveal continued institutional accumulation. On January 26, North Carolina wealth management firm Kingfisher Capital reported holding 114,350 shares of GBTC as of December 31—a significant increase from the 20,887 shares reported in October. Similarly, on January 25, Rothschild Investment Corporation, one of the largest institutional holders of GBTC, reported holding 232,311 shares as of December 31, representing an increase of 93,521 shares from their October reporting.
Morgan Stanley has also demonstrated increased exposure to Bitcoin through Grayscale products. The banking giant's three funds increased their GBTC holdings by an average of 60% during the third quarter of last year, acquiring over 6.63 million additional shares. Their Growth Portfolio Fund alone added 1.5 million GBTC shares, while the Insight Fund increased its position by nearly 600,000 shares. At GBTC's primary market share price of $35.07, this represented approximately $230 million in additional Bitcoin exposure for the investment bank.
Grayscale has simultaneously expanded its potential investment offerings. A recent official announcement identified 25 digital assets "under consideration" for future investment products. This list includes several prominent digital assets not currently represented in Grayscale's existing product lineup, indicating the company's ongoing commitment to expanding its investment offerings as the digital asset ecosystem evolves.
Currently, Grayscale offers 14 single-asset trust funds, one DeFi fund, and a large-cap digital asset fund that includes multiple major cryptocurrencies. The company has indicated it will continue to monitor and evaluate additional assets for potential inclusion in future products as the digital asset ecosystem expands.
Crypto ETFs: The Emerging Competitive Frontier
While Grayscale has experienced rapid growth in assets under management since 2020, the competitive landscape in the crypto fund space is intensifying significantly. The approval of Bitcoin ETFs in Canada, Brazil, and other countries has begun to erode Grayscale's market advantage. Meanwhile, the first month of 2022 alone has seen multiple asset management companies announcing plans to launch crypto asset ETFs.
On January 13, Torus Kling Blockchain IFSC, a joint venture between India's Cosmea Financial Holdings and Kling Trading India, signed a memorandum of understanding with India INX to launch the country's first Bitcoin and Ethereum futures ETFs. These products are expected to launch under the regulatory sandbox framework of the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) by the end of the current fiscal year. If approved, these would become the first cryptocurrency-backed futures ETFs outside the United States.
Shortly thereafter, on January 25, Charles Schwab, the San Francisco-based financial services giant, indicated it was considering applying for Bitcoin and crypto spot ETFs.
Beyond Bitcoin-specific products, established institutions are exploring various types of crypto ETFs. On January 27, Fidelity Investments filed with the SEC for both a "Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF" and a "Fidelity Metaverse ETF." According to preliminary prospectus documents, the crypto industry fund would primarily invest in companies included in a Fidelity index that engage in "activities related to cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital payment processing."
Earlier, on January 18, Brazilian crypto asset management firm Hashdex announced plans to launch a DeFi ETF expected to list on Brazil's B3 exchange in February. This ETF would reportedly consist of 70% DeFi protocols, 15% smart contract platforms, and the remainder comprising supporting infrastructure including identity verification and scalability solutions such as Polygon (MATIC), Chainlink (LINK), and The Graph (GRT).
Naturally, as the world's largest crypto asset manager, Grayscale is also pursuing crypto ETF products. In October last year, Grayscale Investments LLC applied to the SEC to convert GBTC into a Bitcoin ETF, though regulators have yet to approve any physically-backed Bitcoin funds. Beyond the Bitcoin Trust, Grayscale's ultimate goal for its other crypto trust funds is similarly to convert them into ETF structures.
Regulatory Challenges and Future Prospects
The SEC has maintained a cautious stance toward digital asset ETFs, rejecting most Bitcoin ETF applications over the past several years. According to ETF.com data, there are currently over 20 Bitcoin-related ETFs awaiting approval in the United States.
The regulatory resistance continued into 2022 when, on January 20, the SEC rejected SkyBridge Capital's spot Bitcoin ETF proposal using reasoning similar to previous denials. In late 2021, the SEC successively rejected Bitcoin ETF proposals from Kryptoin, VanEck, and WisdomTree. Meanwhile, the regulator has approved several Bitcoin futures ETFs, including products from VanEck, ProShares, and Valkyrie.
Grayscale has publicly challenged this differential treatment. In November, GBTC's operator sent a letter to SEC Secretary Vanessa Countryman arguing that the SEC "lacks a basis to treat exchange-traded products that hold bitcoin futures differently from exchange-traded products that hold bitcoin itself." The letter contended that both futures and spot Bitcoin ETF products should receive equal consideration.
This response demonstrates Grayscale's determination to convert its Bitcoin Trust into an ETF structure. However, given the SEC's consistent rejection of spot crypto ETF applications, Grayscale's conversion plans likely face significant regulatory hurdles. Despite these challenges, market observers suggest that approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF would likely trigger substantial additional institutional investment, potentially elevating Wall Street's Bitcoin holdings to significantly higher levels.
👉 Explore advanced investment strategies
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a negative premium rate indicate for Grayscale's Trusts?
A negative premium rate suggests that the shares are trading below the value of the underlying assets. This typically indicates reduced secondary market demand and potentially changing investor sentiment toward the underlying digital assets.
Why are institutions still increasing their GBTC holdings despite negative premiums?
Some institutions may be accumulating positions in anticipation of Grayscale successfully converting its trust to an ETF structure, which could eliminate the premium/discount mechanism and create arbitrage opportunities.
What is the difference between a futures-based ETF and a spot Bitcoin ETF?
Futures-based ETFs hold Bitcoin futures contracts rather than actual Bitcoin, while spot ETFs would hold the physical cryptocurrency. The SEC has so far only approved futures-based products due to concerns about market manipulation in spot markets.
How might ETF approval impact the cryptocurrency market?
ETF approval would likely bring significant additional institutional investment into cryptocurrency markets, potentially increasing liquidity, reducing volatility, and establishing stronger connections between traditional finance and digital assets.
What factors does the SEC consider when evaluating Bitcoin ETF applications?
The SEC primarily focuses on concerns about market manipulation, liquidity, custody solutions, and whether the proposed ETF would meet the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, particularly regarding investor protection.
Are there any currently approved spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States?
As of now, the SEC has not approved any spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States, having only approved futures-based Bitcoin ETFs despite numerous applications for spot products.