Recent data reveals that for the third consecutive quarter, the quarterly growth rate of Bitcoin purchases by global listed companies has surpassed that of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This trend is driven by an increasingly favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies, prompting more corporations to emulate the operational strategies of firms like MicroStrategy by expanding their Bitcoin reserves.
According to information from Bitcoin data provider Bitcoin Treasuries, global publicly traded companies collectively acquired approximately 131,000 Bitcoin in the last quarter, marking an 18% increase from the previous quarter. In contrast, the growth in Bitcoin holdings by ETFs during the same period was 8%, equivalent to about 111,000 Bitcoin.
Nick Marinoff, head of research at Ecoinometrics, highlighted that despite significant market volatility in April due to Trump's tariff policy announcements, listed companies still increased their Bitcoin holdings by 4% that month, outperforming ETFs' 2% growth. "These companies aren't focused on short-term price fluctuations," Marinoff explained. "They're strategically accumulating Bitcoin to enhance their appeal to potential acquirers."
Marinoff further noted that "the purchasing motivations of institutional investors holding Bitcoin through ETFs differ fundamentally from those of listed companies. The latter accumulate Bitcoin specifically to enhance shareholder value, regardless of market conditions."
This trend reflects the broader cryptocurrency industry's benefit from significantly relaxed regulations under the Trump administration. In March, Trump signed an executive order establishing a U.S. Bitcoin reserve, sending a clear signal that this once-controversial digital asset is here to stay.
The last time ETF Bitcoin purchases exceeded those of listed companies was in the third quarter of 2024, before Trump's re-election.
Several notable corporate movements demonstrate this trend during Q2: GameStop officially began purchasing Bitcoin after its board approved adding it to reserve assets in March; healthcare company KindlyMD merged with Bitcoin investment firm Nakamoto; and ProCap initiated its own Bitcoin acquisition program while preparing for a public listing through a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC).
Despite this corporate buying spree, ETFs remain the single largest entity in terms of Bitcoin holdings. Since Bitcoin ETFs launched in the United States in January 2024, these funds have accumulated over 1.4 million Bitcoin, representing approximately 6.8% of the 21 million Bitcoin supply cap. Listed companies collectively hold about 855,000 Bitcoin, or 4% of the total supply.
MicroStrategy continues to be the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, with approximately 597,000 Bitcoin in its treasury. Today, more than 140 publicly traded companies have followed MicroStrategy's strategy of substantial Bitcoin accumulation.
However, Marinoff suggests this trend might not sustain indefinitely. "A decade from now, we likely won't see as many companies pursuing this strategy," he predicts. "As more corporations adopt Bitcoin reserves, the competitive advantage for any single firm diminishes. Additionally, Bitcoin will likely become more mainstream, and regulations surrounding direct corporate ownership may relax." He characterizes the current trend as "companies attempting to capitalize on this arbitrage opportunity while it exists."
Why Listed Companies Are Embracing Bitcoin
Corporate treasury diversification represents the primary driver behind this movement. With traditional investments offering diminishing returns and increasing inflation concerns, companies seek alternative stores of value. Bitcoin's limited supply and decentralized nature make it an attractive hedge against economic uncertainty.
The changing regulatory landscape has significantly reduced perceived risks. Clearer guidelines and governmental acceptance have transformed Bitcoin from a speculative gamble to a legitimate asset class for corporate balance sheets.
Strategic Implementation of Bitcoin Reserves
Companies typically adopt one of three approaches when adding Bitcoin to their treasuries: direct purchase through exchanges, acquisition via dedicated investment firms, or merger with Bitcoin-focused companies. Each method offers different advantages in terms of security, expertise requirement, and regulatory compliance.
Proper risk management remains crucial. Most companies allocate only a small percentage of their total reserves to Bitcoin initially, gradually increasing exposure as they gain comfort with volatility and custody solutions.
👉 Explore advanced treasury management strategies
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are companies buying Bitcoin instead of other cryptocurrencies?
Bitcoin's first-mover advantage, largest market capitalization, and widespread recognition make it the preferred choice for corporate treasuries. Its established infrastructure and relatively clear regulatory status provide comfort to conservative corporate boards.
How do companies account for Bitcoin on their balance sheets?
Most companies treat Bitcoin as an intangible asset with indefinite life, subject to impairment testing under applicable accounting standards. Some jurisdictions are developing specific guidance for cryptocurrency accounting.
What risks do companies face when holding Bitcoin?
Price volatility remains the primary concern, along with regulatory changes, security risks, and technological evolution. Companies mitigate these through limited allocations, secure storage solutions, and long-term holding strategies.
Will this trend continue indefinitely?
Probably not. As Bitcoin becomes more mainstream, the competitive advantage of early adoption will diminish. Additionally, other digital assets might eventually compete for corporate treasury allocation as regulations clarify.
How does Bitcoin improve shareholder value?
Through potential price appreciation, enhanced corporate branding as innovative leaders, and improved treasury returns compared to traditional low-yield instruments. Some companies also use Bitcoin for specific operational purposes.
What minimum size company typically adopts this strategy?
While MicroStrategy pioneered this approach for large caps, companies of various sizes now participate. The strategy appears most accessible to companies with strong cash positions and forward-thinking leadership, regardless of market capitalization.